This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Akayo
ripe at akayo.eu
Thu Apr 13 17:32:57 CEST 2023
Dear colleagues! The €10,400.00 is the result of the calculator. You can try it out, I get this result for 7 x IPv4 /22, 7 x IPv6 /29 and 3 x ASNs. No transfers, no PI space. Here is a screenshot: https://imgur.com/vVnHTyG Anyway, this scheme is not fair due to the capping. It raises the costs for small and mid-sized companies dramatically while huge companies are not affected. I think there are only two ways. Either 1. all should pay the same or 2. all exactly as many IPv4 addresses and ASNs they hold (*). (*) IPv6 should not be punished. These category instead of real-usage based schemes make no sense for me. They are not fair as they stop on the half way.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]