This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ripe-list] A frank discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ripe-list] A frank discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ripe-list] A frank discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at larus.net
Fri Oct 28 12:23:32 CEST 2022
Hi Toma: "The requestors didn't know about these nuances of the Mauritian legislation." Hans have confirm the request was reviewed and approved by 5 RIR's lawyers, in a common sense, I would expect him to know the nuance before signing such letter on behalf of RIPE. And obviously AFRINIC knows the nuance, can you confirm the above statement you refer RIPE NCC did not know? where is your knowledge come from? And someone from RIPE NCC or Hans himself please confirm this is information was told to the community in private during RIPE meeting, because I did not see any official statement about it. I did not declare anything, I simply state the fact based on public available information. Lu Heng Chief Executive Officer LARUS Limited Email H.Lu at LARUS.netmailto:a.yan at outsideheaven.com Office tel:+852+29888918 Address A3, 11/F, TML Tower, Tsuen Wan, N.T, Hong Kong SAR Website: LARUS.net This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. ---- On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:41:14 +0800 Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote --- Peace, Inline, On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 2:34 PM Lu Heng <mailto:h.lu at larus.net> wrote: > The NRO send a letter to mauritus goverment request > to be specialized agency of United nation Your statement does not make sense. One cannot request a UN agency status from the Mauritius government, because the Mauritius government cannot grant such a status. Only the UN can. On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 8:49 AM Lu Heng <mailto:h.lu at larus.net> wrote: > The letter [to the Mauritius government] was published on 12th July [..] > In the letter, NRO request to make RIR "international organisation" > to achieve "better outcome". > > on September 8th, the Mauritius government rejected a request from AFRINIC > > According to the "international organisations and conferences > (privileges and immunities) act" (link below), International organization > means "specialized agency of the United Nations", and ITU is a > "specialized agency of the United Nations". Aha, so it just seems like a malformed request. The requestors didn't know about these nuances of the Mauritian legislation. Sad, but understandable. I believe it was even discussed before, elsewhere. Not quite what you declared it to be, though. -- Töma -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20221028/5680adb3/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ripe-list] A frank discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ripe-list] A frank discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]