This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] NRO letter to Mauritian Government
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NRO letter to Mauritian Government
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NRO letter to Mauritian Government
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Jul 19 11:13:00 CEST 2022
Hi Hans Petter, > The NRO’s letter was a joint effort by the legal teams of the five RIRs, after AFRINIC requested our support in the matter. We firmly believe it was important to add our name alongside the other RIRs and collectively put our weight behind AFRINIC’s request to the Mauritian government. There is nothing wrong with that (although a have seen no board resolution or community mandate in AFRINIC to this effect, but that’s up to the AFRINIC community to discuss). I do however have big problem with the language used in that letter, as I have made clear in this email and follow up emails. You have omitted responding to that. As that is the core question i would ask you and the board to respond to that please. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NRO letter to Mauritian Government
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NRO letter to Mauritian Government
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]