This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Sep 28 19:20:12 CEST 2020
> When we looked at possible software options for our RPKI validator, we > compared performance, memory, robustness, agility of development i observe with sadness that technical correctness was not one of your criteria. as you will see from our imc paper next month, due to lack thereof, route origin validation is an operational daster waiting to happen. and the epicenter is in the netherlands, and not just at the ncc. we feared the dutch court attack. we got the dutch vendor attack. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]