[members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lukas Tribus
lukas at ltri.eu
Mon Sep 28 14:45:56 CEST 2020
Gert wrote: > When we looked at possible software options for our RPKI validator, we > compared performance, memory, robustness, agility of development, and > this all concluded in "this was nice as a demonstration vehicle, but I do > not want to run it near a any production system, ever". The real issue is: a lot of network operators do NOT have the time for this kind of assessment. They make a judgement call based on the good overall reputation of RIPE (and as Erik mentioned: training) and just go with it. I agree and support sunsetting the development of the RIPE RPKI validator. -- lukas
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Draft Activity Plan 2021 - RPKI development
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]