This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Webauthn
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Theodoros Polychniatis
tpolychnia at ripe.net
Wed Oct 7 16:03:40 CEST 2020
Hello, First of all, thank you for the suggestions. We would also like to have more authentication options than the TOTP in RIPE NCC Access, such as U2F or biometrics/webauthn. The current setup with the ID Management tool used internally does not support the new protocols, and it is not trivial to implement them from scratch. Having said that, this is on our radar and if priorities allow us, we would like to explore new tools or services that provide more authentication/authorisation options. Best regards, Theo -- Theodoros Polychniatis Assistant Manager SW Engineering Dept. +31 652826817 RIPE NCC On 02/10/2020 02:18, Bogdan I. wrote: > Hello > > What would be your opinion of implementing Webauthn / U2F by security > keys for the RIPE NCC website's two factor authentication, in addition > to the current TOTP system? > > The current TOTP based system works fine, but i find using a physical > security key to be more convenient and more secure. >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]