[members-discuss] Webauthn
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonios Chariton (daknob)
daknob at daknob.net
Fri Oct 2 12:49:55 CEST 2020
Thanks for bringing this up Bogdan. I fully agree, and I think it’s something that can ensure better account security for the RIPE members. I think as a minimum, multiple keys must be supported, and also, ideally, there should be an option to only use WebAuthn, and not any other system, such as fallback to TOTP. Antonis > On 2 Oct 2020, at 02:18, Bogdan I. <admin at redcluster.net> wrote: > > Hello > > What would be your opinion of implementing Webauthn / U2F by security keys for the RIPE NCC website's two factor authentication, in addition to the current TOTP system? > > The current TOTP based system works fine, but i find using a physical security key to be more convenient and more secure. > > -- > Bogdan Ionescu > Redcluster LTD > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daknob%40daknob.net
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Webauthn
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]