This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] External thoughts on the Executive Board Election TF
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] External thoughts on the Executive Board Election TF
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] External thoughts on the Executive Board Election TF
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Harry Cross
me at harrycross.me
Sat Nov 7 15:21:58 CET 2020
To be honest, I think this entire thing is a key example of where my proposal to have the MLs locked open, with a side channel for discussion publicly would work well. Instead of "he said... she said", there would be an independent channel where people can see what actually happened. On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 2:12 PM Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io> wrote: > Toma, can you confirm or deny that you are part of the mob-like Ops-Trust > community ? (https://portal.ops-trust.net/) > ------------------------------ > *From:* members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of > Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:00 PM > *To:* Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at v4escrow.net> > *Cc:* Members Discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net> > *Subject:* Re: [members-discuss] External thoughts on the Executive Board > Election TF > > Peace, > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020, 4:40 PM Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at v4escrow.net> > wrote: > > my understanding is that the tf was formed of the full set of those who > volunteered. > > > a person was kicked out. just for the record. > > > The person was kicked after their non constructive criticism and code of > conduct violations led to I think two other people announcing their > intention to abandon their participation and contribution, at which point > it was clear that it's impossible to preserve the original task force size > anyway. > > The goal was to maximise the number of people involved, i.e. having one > task force member leaving was considered better than having two. > > -- > Töma > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/me%40harrycross.me > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20201107/71a4e130/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] External thoughts on the Executive Board Election TF
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] External thoughts on the Executive Board Election TF
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]