[members-discuss] Good to know

Franco,

What you wrote makes a lot of sense, specially that it is not backed by anything, we all thank you.

Respefctulley,
Elad
________________________________
From: Franco Tauceri <franco.tauceri at domainregister.it>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 3:46 PM
To: Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io>; members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know

According to H. L. Mencken, "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Elad Cohen just gave us three good examples of this, proposing for three different complex problems three simple solutions, which are wrong.

Thank you, Elad. We understood Mencken's lesson, now you can stop.

Regards

--
[https://domainregister.international/templates/dr/assets/images/dr-logo.svg]
Franco Tauceri
DomainRegister
m:      39.3483064202
w:      https://DomainRegister.international  e: franco.tauceri at domainregister.it<mailto:franco.tauceri at domainregister.it>


On 01/05/2020 01:44 PM, Elad Cohen wrote:


Vevida,

The specs you can see in my first post.

Regarding FPGA - as I already explained in my first post and I need to repeat and to spam the list because of you - any end-device (can it be ASIC / FPGA / Windows operating system / Linux operating system / etc) will not be able to speak IPv4+ unless it will be updated/upgraded, but even if it will not be updated/upgraded it will still be able to speak IPv4 exactly like it is now, the internet will not break, it will just be able to reach IPv4 destination addresses - exactly like it is working now.

Now let us all be quiet and respect the list.

Respectfully,
Elad

________________________________
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Vevida Hostmaster <hostmaster at vevida.com>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:38 PM
Cc: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know


On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
>
> This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical
> discussions at all.
> Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present
> here,
> who can give reasoned answers/proposals
> (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).
>
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be
someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still
continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks
about, bending the subject.

Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing.

Regards,

Arjen


_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net
https://mailman.ripe.net/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net>
https://mailman.ripe.net/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/franco.tauceri%40domainregister.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200501/bc34692d/attachment.html>