This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Good to know
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elad Cohen
elad at netstyle.io
Fri May 1 13:02:48 CEST 2020
---- "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." ---- This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from the current state (such as IPv6 deployers). Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 1:56 PM To: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 2020-05-01 13:33, Elad Cohen wrote: > Craig, > > You are the one currently personally attacking and I'm asking from > you to stop and not to spam the list, all I did was to make 3 posts > regarding what I will show in the General Meetings and then I was > personally attacked. > > --- > If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on > how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC > board to realise their ideas. > --- > In reality, in order to make an idea come true - power is needed - in > this case the power of Ripe and power of the other RIR's which are > connected to Ripe, you are only attacking and you have no clue in what > you are writing, in how to implement new methods, in how to change > habits. Without me being in the Ripe Board the ideas will not come > true and no one else will push them. As far as I know, Internet standards are accepted collectively, and this does not require person to be internet czar. My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone. And almost always in the process of technical discussion in relevant workgroups, ideas are adjusted and finalized. Can we see somewhere a previous technical discussions, in relevant workgroups, where all these proposals were discussed, improved and seems rejected for an apparently unfair reason? And, in general - trying to force on everybody technically poorly thought-out decisions using power - is an extremely bad idea. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss at ripe.net https://mailman.ripe.net/ Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200501/8a2ecb13/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]