[members-discuss] Good to know
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elad Cohen
elad at netstyle.io
Fri May 1 13:02:48 CEST 2020
---- "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." ---- This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from the current state (such as IPv6 deployers). Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 1:56 PM To: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 2020-05-01 13:33, Elad Cohen wrote: > Craig, > > You are the one currently personally attacking and I'm asking from > you to stop and not to spam the list, all I did was to make 3 posts > regarding what I will show in the General Meetings and then I was > personally attacked. > > --- > If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on > how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC > board to realise their ideas. > --- > In reality, in order to make an idea come true - power is needed - in > this case the power of Ripe and power of the other RIR's which are > connected to Ripe, you are only attacking and you have no clue in what > you are writing, in how to implement new methods, in how to change > habits. Without me being in the Ripe Board the ideas will not come > true and no one else will push them. As far as I know, Internet standards are accepted collectively, and this does not require person to be internet czar. My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone. And almost always in the process of technical discussion in relevant workgroups, ideas are adjusted and finalized. Can we see somewhere a previous technical discussions, in relevant workgroups, where all these proposals were discussed, improved and seems rejected for an apparently unfair reason? And, in general - trying to force on everybody technically poorly thought-out decisions using power - is an extremely bad idea. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss at ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200501/8a2ecb13/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]