[members-discuss] [SPAM] Re: Technical solution to resolve Spoofed IP traffic, Spoofed amplification DDoS attacks, BGP&RIR hijacking, IoT botnet infections and Botnet C&Cs
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve Spoofed IP traffic, Spoofed amplification DDoS attacks, BGP&RIR hijacking, IoT botnet infections and Botnet C&Cs
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [SPAM] Re: Technical solution to resolve Spoofed IP traffic, Spoofed amplification DDoS attacks, BGP&RIR hijacking, IoT botnet infections and Botnet C&Cs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Fri May 1 00:39:06 CEST 2020
Peace, On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 1:14 AM Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io> wrote: > I agree with you, let us all keep with the ddos attacks and not resolve them. This is showing *no* respect to the whole Internet community and all the work that has been done in *years*, the literal person-years, if not decades or centuries, invested into fighting and processing DDoS attacks. BGP flow specification, S/RTBH, Open Threat Signalling, Manufacturer Usage Description, QUIC Initial Packet padding, to name a few. The Internet community, and the RIPE community as a part of it, is not *okay* with DDoS attacks. A hard work is being done. You haven't done your homework by analysing the history of the topic before proposing what you have proposed. -- Töma
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve Spoofed IP traffic, Spoofed amplification DDoS attacks, BGP&RIR hijacking, IoT botnet infections and Botnet C&Cs
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [SPAM] Re: Technical solution to resolve Spoofed IP traffic, Spoofed amplification DDoS attacks, BGP&RIR hijacking, IoT botnet infections and Botnet C&Cs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]