This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] About transfer policies
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] About transfer policies
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] About transfer policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nikolas Pediaditis
npediaditi at ripe.net
Wed Mar 4 17:40:50 CET 2020
Dear Dmitry and all, While we do not discuss individual cases in detail publicly, we can share some information with the list on what is happening in situations like this. In some cases, we may undertake a more extended due diligence process that can take longer than usual. This could be, for example, because something has come to our attention that was previously not considered. In such cases we may need to verify issues with third parties (such as national authorities). Due to the number of countries in our service region and the differences in how national authorities in each country operate it is unfortunately not possible to always be aware of the meaning of every detail in the documents that we receive. And when we are not certain about a detail that can potentially be important, we need to verify it. We realise that this is sometimes inconvenient and might mean that the process can take longer for the parties involved. But we see this as essential in order to ensure the security of all our members' resources, especially in the current landscape where IPv4 addresses are increasingly the target of fraud and hijacking attempts. Our processes are not static but adapt where necessary so we can maintain strong due diligence for all members. With regards to our response times, for many years now our general aim has been to respond within one business day. Occasionally we do need more time to work through more complex situations, but in these cases we try to give regular updates as they progress. Kind regards, Nikolas Pediaditis Registration Services & Policy Development Manager RIPE NCC > On 3 Mar 2020, at 16:49, Dmitry P <head at global-data-networks.com> wrote: > > I think what you are telling is out of the context of this issue. Me > being a valid person or not in signing the documents is not in question > and it is a proven fact because the extracts given by ministry of > justice have a unique number that could be accessed and verified online > any time by anyone. There are also a lot of resources that facilitate > verifying any company information such as this one > https://youcontrol.com.ua/en/catalog/company_details/40508891/ so I > believe what you said is a little bit out of topic. > > The RIPE's issue with our extract is different and I believe I've > described it very well in my first email. > > On 3/3/20 2:02 PM, Terrence Koeman wrote: >> Well, *you* say that you meet the requirement that a valid person is signing the documents, but RIPE is not convinced. And it's RIPE that needs to be convinced before it becomes a fact to them in regards of their policy. That there is some unconnected fact of the matter is irrelevant. >> >> If your logic worked I could just send in no documents at all and say "why is it my problem that RIPE doesn't know the content of the documents?" >> > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/rsstaff%40ripe.net >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] About transfer policies
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] About transfer policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]