This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ondrej Zajicek
santiago at crfreenet.org
Tue Jul 21 15:31:27 CEST 2020
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0000, Elad Cohen wrote: > > The total number of my initial votes was more than the total number of > votes of the elected #3 which was elected only because he received the > support of the elected #1 in the way that the current voting system > works. You seem to misinterpret how the voting system works. The #3 was not elected because he received the support from the elected #1, he was elected because voters who vote for #1 or #2 at the first position also voted for #3 at non-first positions. He also received plenty of votes at non-first positons from other candidates eliminated in the third round. -- Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]