This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Executive Board Election Task Force Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Executive Board Election Task Force Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Executive Board Election Task Force Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pavel Polyakov
p.polyakov+ripe at urdn.com.ua
Mon Jul 20 23:06:47 CEST 2020
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:49:29 +0000 Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io> wrote: > only because I care of the core values of the internet such as > privacy Cut the crap. You clearly do not care about ethics. You care about your own self good. All your conspiracy theories regarding the RIPE are ridiculous. We have actually had a completely opposite experience; when we raised awareness regarding the delegation of filtering to third parties and DNSBL, our concerns were taken seriously and the problem was obviously understood. An article was even posted very shortly afterwards. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/razvano/mail-filtering-rethinking-our-reliance-on-rbls > and more about their illegal bigger secret group here: > > https://portal.ops-trust.net/ There is nothing interesting on that page. Where are your evidences that Spamhaus is in control of the RIPE? Also, where are your evidences that every member you have libeled is actually working for Spamhaus? Some Spamhaus supporters have tried to obtain seats before, as far as I remember they've always flopped and that's good. My guess is that you have been tricked by Spamhaus because of your incompetence, which likely resulted in Spamhaus obtaining personal details on you and posting them on their website. As a result you are now paranoid and see everyone who disagrees with you as a Spamhaus agent. Even though creating public profiles of people that Spamhaus deemed spammers was likely in violation of the GDPR. That is definitely not the core of the problem. PP
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Executive Board Election Task Force Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Executive Board Election Task Force Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]