This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at vedege.net
Mon Jul 6 19:15:14 CEST 2020
Hello, Thanks Sebastien for your support, Le lundi 06 juillet 2020 à 17:08 +0000, Sebastien Brossier a écrit : > A too strict procedure discourages people from updating their LIR > details, which goes against what should be one of our primary goals: > keeping the RIPE database up-to-date and accurate. And, if the aim is to prevent fraudulent resource transfer: Why not adding to the procedure a 24months lock period to the resources after the LIR contractual name change? That could at least prevent fraudulent mechanism to take profit of such a procedure, isn't it? Regards, -- Clément Cavadore
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]