This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [LIR] Re: Membership Fee Question
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Wiesinger
sebastian.wiesinger at noris.net
Thu Feb 27 09:03:00 CET 2020
* Skyline Telecom <Skylinetelecom at outlook.com> [2020-02-26 21:12]: > Dominic, > > I think the reason is that at the GM RIPE misleadingly said that > even if we redistribute only “50%” of the surplus, the amount will > be the same as last year. Which clearly it isn’t. If I remember correctly the wording was that it would be "pretty much" the same amount. 353 EUR vs. 567 EUR from a business perspective sounds like "pretty much the same" to me. > Unfortunately many based their votes on what the people at RIPE SAID > and they didn’t do the math themselves, otherwise they would have > seen that there is a significant difference in amounts. And now RIPE > is covered, they will say “you voted, case closed” even though they > gave very misleading information. If 214 EUR means a "significant difference" for your business I think it would be time to reevaluate your business model. Regards Sebastian
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [LIR] Re: Membership Fee Question
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]