[members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dominic Schallert
ds at schallert.com
Wed Feb 26 21:21:44 CET 2020
I'm aware of the GM vote and resolution 1, but in my opinion there was a clear lack for Option C (redistribute 100%)… Thanks > Am 26.02.2020 um 19:58 schrieb Schnabeltier <ripe-member-discuss at cidr.eu>: > > > I can‘t understand why the surplus redistribution in 2019 had been EUR 567,52 and in 2020 it’s only > > EUR 353,82 per LIR. This does not match with the actual new-LIR development figures in 2019 > > according to https://labs.ripe.net/statistics/number-of-lirs > > Because only 50% was redistributed this year: > > “The General Meeting approves that 50% of the RIPE NCC 2019 financial surplus will be > added to the Clearing House reserve and 50% of the RIPE NCC 2019 financial surplus > will be redistributed to the membership in 2020.” > https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/announcements/ripe-ncc-general-meeting-october-2019 > > Kind Regards, > Schnabeltier > > > From: Dominic Schallert <ds at schallert.com <x-msg://1/email/new/1/ds%40schallert.com>> > Sent: Wednesday, 26. Feb 2020 – 19:38 CET +0100 > To: members-discuss at ripe.net <x-msg://1/email/new/1/members-discuss%40ripe.net> > > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question > > I can‘t understand why the surplus redistribution in 2019 had been EUR 567,52 and in 2020 it’s only EUR 353,82 per LIR. This does not match with the actual new-LIR development figures in 2019 according to https://labs.ripe.net/statistics/number-of-lirs <https://labs.ripe.net/statistics/number-of-lirs> > > Regards > > >>>>> Am 26.02.2020 um 15:26 schrieb Radu-Adrian Feurdean <ripe-ncc at radu-adrian.feurdean.net>: >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, at 21:41, Arash Naderpour wrote: >>> It doesn't looks fair to me, but you need to see enough support from >>> the memebers to change it, NCC also like easy money, same as many of >>> others. >> >> ...and as most of its members who do enjoy the redistribution (when there is one) the next year. >> >> Back to the initial question, the membership fee *IS* pro-rated when you *open* the LIR, sometimes to the advantage of the new member (not including an extra quarter for up to 2 or 3 weeks only). >> >> If you perform a merger via "M&A Process", the rules are pretty clear that both LIRs involved need to be with membership fees paid. Even if you would manage to propose a resolution to change this, I'm not sure it will pass. >> >> -- >> Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ds%40schallert.com > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ds%40schallert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200226/89654ef1/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200226/89654ef1/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]