This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian Feurdean
ripe-ncc at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Wed Feb 26 15:22:25 CET 2020
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, at 21:41, Arash Naderpour wrote: > It doesn't looks fair to me, but you need to see enough support from > the memebers to change it, NCC also like easy money, same as many of > others. ...and as most of its members who do enjoy the redistribution (when there is one) the next year. Back to the initial question, the membership fee *IS* pro-rated when you *open* the LIR, sometimes to the advantage of the new member (not including an extra quarter for up to 2 or 3 weeks only). If you perform a merger via "M&A Process", the rules are pretty clear that both LIRs involved need to be with membership fees paid. Even if you would manage to propose a resolution to change this, I'm not sure it will pass. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Membership Fee Question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]