This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Willem Jan Withagen
wjw at digiware.nl
Sun Apr 26 15:50:47 CEST 2020
On 26-4-2020 13:55, Paul Thornton wrote: > > On 26/04/2020 12:11, Elad Cohen wrote: > >> ...you don't need to implement a protocol in order to >> prove it works, ... > > I think you will find that this is *exactly* how new protocols are > introduced to the community. People get a working prototype running > and can show (1) that it works and (2) that its perceived benefits > outweigh its potential flaws. I'm having a very hard time envisioning the "easy" software application changes that are required to support this. All ipv4 code depends on the fact an ipv4 address is 4 bytes. All ipv6 code depends on the fact an ipv6 address is 16 bytes. Now this requires either 1 extra bit somewhere, or another structure describing ipv4+ in sockaddr. So for this idea to be workable, implementations are the only thing that are going to convince application developers to jump on the bandwagon. And that'll be the same struggle af for IPv6. And as long as the likes of github.com don't even do ipv6, I very much doubt that ipv4+ is going to go anywhere. Let alone that it will arrive there faster. So instead of going after "yet another pot of gold", lets get IPv6 going. just my 2 cts. --WjW
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]