[members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world

Didn't you read what I wrote regarding the round table ?

Each member of the round table will be responsible to update its own software and will be rewarded for it, not you will do it and not your useless friends that can do nothing but sit and let other do their hard work, I did the hard work here, you are the talker.

"it shows that you don't have a clue what you are talking about" - protocols are flows, you don't need to implement a protocol in order to prove it works, no one here denied that it will work besides the disturbed IPv6 fanatic that didn't agree to write any flaw publicly in order for me to confront with him, Ripe have a list of expenses of 30 million euros per year, go ask Ripe to assign a very small part of it for the implementation.

Do you want me to patch any networking stack of any operating system that exist ? do I have the source code from Microsoft ?

Respectfully,
Elad
________________________________
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Denis Fondras <ripe at liopen.fr>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 1:42 PM
To: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world

Claiming it is "easy" to implement is no enough. Please show us a working
implementation (a proof of concept), it should not be hard.

Or is it hard for you but easy for anyone else to do ? If so, it shows that you
don't have a clue what you are talking about. I find that a bit sad.

In France, we call people like you "Yakafokon". It means that talk is cheap, you
have a supposed solution but will let others deal with the dirty work.

You will not convince any of us with words. Roll up their sleeves and show us
that it works somewhere else than your own mind (any supporter of your idea can
join).

The idea of using "unused" fields in the IPv4 header to extend adressing space
is not new, it has been discussed multiple times everywhere on the Internet. We
have never seen a single working implementation. You can still believe it is
because the "IPv6 sect" has been actively undermining the work...

For anyone claiming to have a solution for the "IPv4 exhaustion problem", do
your homework before wasting the time of hundreds of mailing list participants.
Thank you in advance.

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net
https://mailman.ripe.net/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200426/e508a4cb/attachment.html>