[members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world

Hi,

> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Bruno Cordioli wrote:
>> I think it is appropriate to close this discussion here.
>> Elad will eventually submit his proposed al RIPE meeting or he'll write a
>> RFC.
> 
> Basically, this.

Seconded

> [...]
> 
> Overall, as long as no implementations can be provided (source code on
> github etc) this sounds like a somewhat cheap shot to make people believe
> you're going to solve their IPv4 problems if they just vote you to the
> NCC executive board.  And I hope the NCC members are smart enough to not
> vote based on glorious promises, but on track record, provable background,
> etc.

I have contacted Elad off-list and shown him many fallacies in his design. He insisted implementation and deployment of IPv4+ was easy. I told him he is delusional and that I emailed him off-list as not to shame him publicly, and all he said was:

> Go ahead, shame me publicly and you will receive the exact same answers, you are obviously have interests regarding IPv6 and you are trying to avoid from the world more IPv4 addresses just for your own personal profit.
> 
> You are obviously have illegal interests in Ripe and this is the only reasons for your emails to me.

There is no talking sense into this person. He is oblivious to how the internet works and how hardware and software upgrades are implemented and deployed. Obviously pointing out his flaws means I have an illegal interest somehow.

I think Elad has already tried following Trump's recent advice and we are seeing the consequences…

Time to move on…
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200426/8a5332e0/attachment.sig>