[members-discuss] IPv6 amount for one member

What if the IPv6 is used privately? I mean we have a /29 and we have used some of it for internal infrastructure on networks,
that are currently not linked to upstream IPv6 provider.

Are we in danger of loosing our current IPv6 allocation?

Marian

On 10/16/19 1:41 PM, Paul Thornton wrote:
> Hi Gert,
> 
> On 15/10/2019 22:46, Gert Doering wrote:
>> I am fairly sure there is more to this than "just because receiving
>> party already had a /29" - nothing in the policies would forbid that.
>>
>> Gert Doering
>>          -- NetMaster
>>
> As a datapoint, I certainly have been on the receiving end of this.
> 
> Consider this scenario: LIR X has an existing /29, and LIR Y has a /32.  Closing LIR Y and transferring all resources to LIR X triggered just such a question.
> 
> I know that >/29 allocations are of course allowed - I think the issue arises when an LIR has their whole "initial largest" /29 allocation and then adds more through acquisition or transfer.
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mm%401h.com
> 


-- 
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hackman at jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
IRC: hackman @ irc.freenode.net
Mobile: +359 886 660 270

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20191016/2b3c0aa1/attachment.sig>