[members-discuss] M&A procedure and transfers restrictions
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] M&A procedure and transfers restrictions
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] M&A procedure and transfers restrictions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksey Bulgakov
aleksbulgakov at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 15:47:58 CET 2019
No, it's bad solution. It doesn't stimulate to switch to IPv6. Moreover my question isn't about new rules. I ask why does the NCC tell that M&A isn't subject of transfer of the resources but show transfer statistics and prolong 24 months transfer restriction period? вт, 15 янв. 2019 г., 17:37 Lutz Donnerhacke L.Donnerhacke at iks-service.de: > How about a simple solution: > > - The last/8 policy was designed to give each LIR only a single > IPv4 resource in order to keep future LIRs in the game. > > - Therefore: All resources handed out under the last/8 policy > can be hold only once by a single LIR. > > - If two LIRs merge and both have a /8 resource, they have to > give back one of them. > > - A last/8 resource can’t be transferred to a LIR which already > holds another last/8 resource. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190115/34365feb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] M&A procedure and transfers restrictions
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] M&A procedure and transfers restrictions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]