This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terrence Koeman
terrence at darkness-reigns.com
Tue Feb 19 15:52:07 CET 2019
> From: Patterson, Richard (Sky Network Services (SNS))
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 12:44 PM
[snip]
>
> It felt like the IPv4-conservative approach was being applied to IPv6, and
> that kind of defeats the purpose IMO.
I have experienced this as well. For technical reasons (not convenience), I needed another /29 (or rather 6 /32's). This turned out to take too long and too much of my time, so I gave up and opened another LIR simply for the /29 IPv6.
Of course that meant I had to buy one less /22 IPv4 on the free market, so the tight IPv6 policies directly caused faster depletion of IPv4. Though I don't know whether this happens often enough to be significant, it's still ass-backwards.
--
Regards,
Terrence Koeman, PhD/MTh/BPsy
Darkness Reigns (Holding) B.V.
Please quote relevant replies.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]