This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [SPAM] Re: RIPE legal: Please stop this madness!
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - Go6
jan at go6.si
Tue Feb 19 11:01:51 CET 2019
On 21/01/2019 18:07, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > I would however not pay much attention to a BCOP that recommends /48 for > businesses, /56 for residential, /54 for single moms and /52 for > Fortnite players. Dear Jørgen, That BCOP document was discussed at length and reached consensus at RIPE IPv6 WG and BCOP TF that includes many operators of various sizes. Can you please tell us a bit more about your concerns? Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [SPAM] Re: RIPE legal: Please stop this madness!
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]