This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo De Geer
ripe at shlab.se
Thu Dec 19 10:40:25 CET 2019
My Vote are for B Den 2019-12-19 kl. 10:37, skrev Schnabeltier: > Dear colleagues, > > I think we have three options. I would vote for option B: > > A) Keeping the list. > > B) We would consider it as important to have a list of reliable > brokers. The RIPE NCC would only publish information of brokers which > are verified. If the majority would vote for this option, we have to > find a solution how to verify the integrity of brokers. > > C) We do not consider a list of reliable brokers as important. While > RIPE NCC cannot or does not want to validate the integrity of brokers > at this moment, the list should be removed. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Christian Kaufmann <exec-board at ripe.net > </email/new/1/exec-board%40ripe.net>> > *Sent:* Thursday, 19. Dec 2019 – 10:17 CET +0100 > *To:* members-discuss at ripe.net </email/new/1/members-discuss%40ripe.net> > > *Subject:* [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List > > Dear RIPE NCC members, > > The Executive Board has been following this discussion and we can see > general agreement for a change in the way brokers are listed on the RIPE > NCC's website. > > The question is whether the RIPE NCC should remove the list entirely, or > otherwise take steps to improve its approach. There are pros and cons > with both options. > > Removing the list is straightforward and would spare the RIPE NCC a few > headaches. However, it is worth considering whether the current model > provides some incentive for brokers to play by the rules and what might > happen if this incentive is gone. > > Conversely, it's clear that some brokers are still spamming RIPE > Database contacts. Is this the only problem we are seeking to eliminate > here, or are there others? Could an updated set of terms or a stricter > approach by the RIPE NCC help to mitigate this? > > Before the board makes its decision, we would like to hear your thoughts > on this list. > > Kind regards, > > Christian Kaufmann > RIPE NCC Executive Board Chairman > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripe-member-discuss%40cidr.eu > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripe%40shlab.se -- Vänliga hälsningar / Best regards Leo De Geer MikroTik Certified Consultant/Trainer MTCINE MTCRE MTCTCE MTCWE MTCNA MTCUME MTCIPv6E MTCSE MTCASE Tel +46 325 660 650 Fax +46 325 660 650 Web www.shlab.se e-mail ripe at shlab.se -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20191219/8b6a00c1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Feedback Requested: RIPE NCC Broker List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]