[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
martin.millnert at brainmill.com
Thu Apr 25 15:58:48 CEST 2019
On 2019-04-24, at 22:11:04, Sander Steffann wrote: > I guess an abstention could indicate that you don't want to vote for the options given. If a lot of people abstain then that would be a significant message to the board. One could think the discussions can be seen as a significant message to the board, as well. And if not the discussion, the Executive Board election, could. https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2019/confirmed-candidates Two seats up for filling. The membership can, ideally, elect candidates seeking to represent their interests. To the above mentioned confirmed candidates: What are your positions on the Charging Scheme subject? Best, -- Martin Millnert BrainMill AB https://www.brainmill.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190425/f6728135/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]