This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
martin.millnert at brainmill.com
Thu Apr 25 15:58:48 CEST 2019
On 2019-04-24, at 22:11:04, Sander Steffann wrote: > I guess an abstention could indicate that you don't want to vote for the options given. If a lot of people abstain then that would be a significant message to the board. One could think the discussions can be seen as a significant message to the board, as well. And if not the discussion, the Executive Board election, could. https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2019/confirmed-candidates Two seats up for filling. The membership can, ideally, elect candidates seeking to represent their interests. To the above mentioned confirmed candidates: What are your positions on the Charging Scheme subject? Best, -- Martin Millnert BrainMill AB https://www.brainmill.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190425/f6728135/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]