This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hansen, Christoffer
christoffer at netravnen.de
Wed Apr 17 23:09:58 CEST 2019
On 17/04/2019 22:55, Cedric R via members-discuss wrote: > RIPE is a non profit and have to be fair with any members. Agreed. > If they review their copy about charge based on IPv4 and not on number > of PA/PI, maybe i can vote for it. With you there. I agreed with Doering about the charge for ASNs. If you are being charged for having unused ASNs lying around 'just in case'. I am of the same opinion he is. >>Just return it.<< It's like Right and Left wing opinions. (Much like Politics.) [I need the Middle Ground C-option] -- Christoffer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/8ddbb05d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]