[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hansen, Christoffer
christoffer at netravnen.de
Wed Apr 17 23:09:58 CEST 2019
On 17/04/2019 22:55, Cedric R via members-discuss wrote: > RIPE is a non profit and have to be fair with any members. Agreed. > If they review their copy about charge based on IPv4 and not on number > of PA/PI, maybe i can vote for it. With you there. I agreed with Doering about the charge for ASNs. If you are being charged for having unused ASNs lying around 'just in case'. I am of the same opinion he is. >>Just return it.<< It's like Right and Left wing opinions. (Much like Politics.) [I need the Middle Ground C-option] -- Christoffer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/8ddbb05d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]