[members-discuss] VL: IP transfer (in)security

IPv4 is still widely used and mores to the point that adoption is somewhat lacking due to major access networks not deploying v6.

Simply responding with “time better spent rolling out v6” isn't an answer, the community is looking for a half way house, an interim solution to ease the woes of v4 policy.

I don’t think any one is saying we shouldn’t deploy v6 nor that they want to continue and use v4 despite the looming depletion.

Tom

> On 14 May 2018, at 10:49, Brandon Butterworth <hostmaster at bogons.net> wrote:
> 
> On Mon May 14, 2018 at 08:20:35AM +0000, Janarthanan Sundaram wrote:
>> I think we should prioritize on on point two: what to do with unused blocks.
> 
> Why? This has been discussed many times, there is little space in unused blocks
> and if it was possible to liberate it (unlikely without a legal fight)
> it would probably run out in less time than it took to get it.
> 
> This is a waste of time better spent rolling out v6, in the time spent
> arguing over v4 this could have been done already.
> 
> At this point the only answer is roll out v6 or get off the net as you're
> holding up progress for everyone else.
> 
> regards
> brandon
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/hello%40thomasbibb.co.uk