This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Multiple LIR account mergers
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Multiple LIR account mergers
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Multiple LIR account mergers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Tue May 1 08:27:25 CEST 2018
Simple question - WHY? This restriction is there to reduce number of speculative members/accounts created to bypass spirit of IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies (to obtain more than single /22 from last pool). Expense reduction of those organisations isn't valid argument here. I *don't* support this idea at all. With regards, Daniel On 04/30/2018 03:07 PM, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote: > Hello, all. > > What do you think if the NCC allow to merge accounts of the same company > without 24 months restriction? > > I thing this question should be discussed on the RIPE meeting in Marseille. > > ----- > Kind regards, > Alexey > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/danny%40danysek.cz >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Multiple LIR account mergers
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Multiple LIR account mergers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]