This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Request to update the SSA - Article 2.2, acceptance of documents
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to update the SSA - Article 2.2, acceptance of documents
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to update the SSA - Article 2.2, acceptance of documents
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christian Kratzer
ck at cksoft.de
Tue Jun 26 09:47:12 CEST 2018
Hi, On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, John Fitzgerald wrote: > Since we have seen so many invalid certificates and signatures and even big CAs fail, we are voting for the good old paperwork method. I agree. I also cannot understand why this is such a big deal unless you want to create lots of LIR. For any valid business model setting up a lir is a one time thing where I do not worry about 300 EUR costs for paperwork. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: ck at cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart Mobile: +49 171 1947 843 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer Web: http://www.cksoft.de/
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to update the SSA - Article 2.2, acceptance of documents
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to update the SSA - Article 2.2, acceptance of documents
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]