This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] RIPE forces us to pay the bill unfairly
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE forces us to pay the bill unfairly
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE forces us to pay the bill unfairly
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Thornton
paul at prtsystems.ltd.uk
Tue Jul 10 12:15:55 CEST 2018
On 10/07/2018 09:31, Martin Huněk wrote: > Dear Olena, > > stop looking for sympathy here, you get none. > > As you have written, you have 5 LIRs. It means that you probably have five times more IPv4 space that you deserved. As you might know, these addresses are reserved for late comers so they get at least some portion of the IPv4 space. Every thing else is just a tolerated abuse. Only unfair thing about this whole thing is that it is still tolerated (in the name of accurate database). So it is only fair that you had to pay for such "abuse" of (post-) last /8 space. These rules are there precisely because of that. > I am curious as to how the OP is able to transfer what is clearly non-legacy space out of this LIR when by their own admission, it hasn't been in existence for two years. Paul.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE forces us to pay the bill unfairly
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE forces us to pay the bill unfairly
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]