[members-discuss] [exec-board] [cs] Change of conditions
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [cs] Change of conditions
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [exec-board] Change of conditions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Dec 17 12:44:44 CET 2018
On 14/12/2018 12:00, Henriette Van Ingen wrote: > When we mention documentation from a national authority, this refers to > an entry in a trade registry, or another document issued by a chamber of > commerce - anything from a national authority which can certify that > changes to an organisation or its business structure have taken place. > An agreement from lawyers would not meet this requirement because they > are not a national authority. But we are not talking about "lawyers" we are talking about a Commissioner for Oaths which is a beast of a totally different colour. Some countries do not have a national authority that keeps track of mergers and acquisitions. In this case there *must* be a different defined document that can be used to verify M&As and in the UK at least, the RIPE NCC has, in the past, agreed to accept an affidavit. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [cs] Change of conditions
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [exec-board] Change of conditions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]