This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [exec-board] [cs] Change of conditions
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [cs] Change of conditions
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [exec-board] Change of conditions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Dec 17 12:44:44 CET 2018
On 14/12/2018 12:00, Henriette Van Ingen wrote: > When we mention documentation from a national authority, this refers to > an entry in a trade registry, or another document issued by a chamber of > commerce - anything from a national authority which can certify that > changes to an organisation or its business structure have taken place. > An agreement from lawyers would not meet this requirement because they > are not a national authority. But we are not talking about "lawyers" we are talking about a Commissioner for Oaths which is a beast of a totally different colour. Some countries do not have a national authority that keeps track of mergers and acquisitions. In this case there *must* be a different defined document that can be used to verify M&As and in the UK at least, the RIPE NCC has, in the past, agreed to accept an affidavit. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [cs] Change of conditions
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [exec-board] Change of conditions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]