This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] RIPE NCC Annual Report 2017 and Proposed RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] RIPE NCC Annual Report 2017 and Proposed RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2019
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] RIPE NCC Annual Report 2017 and Proposed RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2019
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Fri Apr 13 07:56:23 CEST 2018
On 12/04/2018 21:57, Daniel Suchy wrote: Rather than us micromanaging the RIPE NCC management, it should be the memberships responsibility to determine a cap on total salaries. The number can be based on number of employees, CoL increases, non-profit organizational status, etc. And we are *not* moving the office or staff. [Side note: The annual report will not open using Foxit Reader 9.0, but does open in Adobe Reader] Finally, I would have liked to see the financial report (and parts of the annual report) without a grey background on every page, which when printed causes a huge amount of extra ink to be wasted. Also, the entire idea of using grey lettering on a grey background may be the current fad, but makes for extreme difficulty in reading. Regards, Hank > On 04/12/2018 05:14 PM, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote: >> So, we can move the RIPE office to another country, with less salary >> numbers. E.g. there are the salary numbers approximately 1500€ in >> Russia, including tax 13%. With social tax 30% the salary numbers are >> 2000€ in Moscow. >> >> What do you think about it? Me and my colleagues, who wrote here >> earlier, are ready to help the community with relocation. > It's not only about staff salaries. There's no quarantee, that such > migration doesn't affect service quality. Cheaper staff doens't always > mean better job. Also there may be some other (hidden) costs. > > Also there're so many questions related to legal aspects of such migration. > > I *don't* support such idea. There's no deep analysis mentioning pros > and cons provided by author of this idea. > > With regards, > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/hank%40efes.iucc.ac.il
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] RIPE NCC Annual Report 2017 and Proposed RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2019
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] RIPE NCC Annual Report 2017 and Proposed RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2019
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]