This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Tue Sep 27 18:10:02 CEST 2016
On 27/09/16 14:10, Nick Hilliard wrote: > They probably won't do this without a policy proposal. So the next step > here would be for you to get consensus on a new policy proposal in APWG > defining the terms where RIPE policies should apply to legacy address > blocks, and in what circumstances the RIPE NCC can forcibly override the > rights of legacy space holders. When you get this through APWG, then > you'll need to convince the RIPE NCC board to implement it. Well, most of the time you don't have to "convince the RIPE NCC board to implement it". The only time that the board would refuse to implement policy (and this has never happened to my knowledge) would be if such a policy were to impact the commercial viability of the NCC, and then we have a fiduciary duty to not allow it. Otherwise... go ahead. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]