This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Floris Bos
bos at je-eigen-domein.nl
Tue Sep 27 18:02:08 CEST 2016
On 09/27/2016 02:01 PM, Daniel Pearson wrote: > I don't think anyone disagrees about coming up with a realistic > pricing discussion. Good. Then the next question would be, what would you consider to be realistic minimum and maximum fees? Personally, I do believe the membership fee between a small start-up and a giant telecom company with millions of IPs and customers can and should be significant, and not just a couple hundred. But yes, I do am realistic enough not to expect the 27 EUR for a /22 absolute fairness. Let's see... - The budget & activity plan expects 21 million membership fee income. - Can differentiate by price by simply counting the total number of IP-addresses that have been allocated to a LIR - Different pricing per category instead of ultimate fair per individual IP pricing as concession to larger LIRs. - Let's have a lower limit of 500 EUR for /22, similar to the $ 500 another NCC charges ( https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html#categories ) - Upper limit of say 8000 EUR for the largest LIRs - If you where to have 5 categories. You could roughly have something like this: Total IP space Number of LIRs Fee Total fee <= /24 1 500 500 <= /23 4 500 2000 <= /22 6081 500 3040500 <= /21 1583 1000 1583000 <= /20 1638 1000 1638000 <= /19 1548 2000 3096000 <= /18 1040 2000 2080000 <= /17 709 4000 2836000 <= /16 385 4000 1540000 <= /15 293 8000 2344000 <= /14 133 8000 1064000 <= /13 110 8000 880000 <= /12 80 8000 640000 <= /11 64 8000 512000 <= /10 25 8000 200000 <= /9 14 8000 112000 <= /8 6 8000 48000 <= /7 2 8000 16000 Totals 13716 21632000 Could also have more categories, or have per IP pricing within a category to smooth things out further. Yours sincerely, Floris Bos
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]