This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Simon Lockhart
s.lockhart at cablecomnetworking.co.uk
Tue Sep 27 13:37:03 CEST 2016
On Tue Sep 27, 2016 at 12:23:07pm +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > I agree with you. If a legacy owner sells all or part of their legacy > > IP space, that IP space should lose its legacy status. > > Why? And how? How could e.g. a RIPE or other RIR policy be used to > implement this when by admission of all, RIR policies do not apply to > legacy space? They can't - but they can refuse to provide the "free" RIR services to anyone other than either the original legacy allocation holder, or the current holder of the entire original legacy allocation. If you buy or lease a portion of the legacy address space, then as far as the RIRs are concerned, you should not be given any special treatment. Simon
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]