This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian Feurdean
ripe-ncc at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Sep 26 22:16:55 CEST 2016
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 13:57, Daniel Pearson wrote: > year, I would assume only 3,000~ or less have just a single /22 > associated to their account. Just as a rough number I came up with about 6070 this evening. I'm talking about a single /22, not necessarily all "last /8". Compared to ~10600 "last /8 allocations". That makes holders of "only a /22" 42% of the membership. 7838 LIRs with equivalent of /21 or less, that's more than half of the membership. They total less than a /8. 2 biggest LIRs have *EACH* of them more than the all the smallest 50% of the LIRs together. Third and fourth biggest LIRs have *TOGETHER* less space than the second biggest. 68 LIRs have more than 1 million IPs each (65 if we count 1 million as 1024*1024). Just numbers obtained in less than 30 minutes from alloclist.txt.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]