[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model

Continuing this conversation beyond the four day mark costs us all time,
which also costs money, the real question is if you think your time spent
on this matter is worth more than the ~400 EUR / year you stand to save
should you win the argument. Because I'm pretty sure winning this argument
is worth way more to those with large IPv4 blocks that you want too slap a
not so insignificant additional fee on, and for what, being an older
company?
If you want to free up more IPv4 space for "the greater good" perhaps try
looking at ways to reclaim space from the real bad guys, people who abused
the loopholes in the last /8 policy to claim way more than a single /22.
Which frankly should be treated with much more animosity than the legacy
resource holders who actually brought the internet to the RIPE area before
ripe even existed.
Frankly, we should all be thanking legacy holders, because with out them,
none of us would have jobs.

-Tim

On 26 Sep 2016 9:26 p.m., "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <
ripe-ncc at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016, at 23:24, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> STOP TRYING TO COME UP WITH WAYS TO RECLAIM IPv4 ADDRESSES. IT WILL
> ACHIEVE NOTHING.

I don't find it as much about reclaiming as it is about making things
the same for everybody: IPv4 = cost (even if it's only symbolic). Right
now IPv4 = profit.

--
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN

----
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the
general page:
https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/

Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From
here, you can add or remove addresses.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160926/11995d32/attachment.html>