This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin List-Petersen
martin at airwire.ie
Fri Sep 23 00:13:10 CEST 2016
On 22/09/16 22:51, Carlos Friacas wrote: > > > Hi Martin, All, > > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Martin List-Petersen wrote: > >> On 22/09/16 20:58, Carlos Friacas wrote: >>> >>> Forgot to mention that this outreach should have included strong >>> messages so governments could be aware they should grab enough IPv4 >>> addresses to satisfy their needs, in order to become truly independent >>> from their current (or future) IP service providers. >>> >>> Some governments only understood they needed to "own" their share of >>> IPv4 space when it was too late, and only got small crumbs... :-( >>> >>> In general, public administration procedures lead to periodic tenders, >>> and service providers (ISPs) are likely to change, and renumbering >>> processes become unavoidable if you don't "own" PI space, Legacy space >>> our your own PA space... ;-) >> >> More backwards thinking. > > Nahhhhh, just a glimpse of local, daily, reality. :-)) > I know. But I'm a dreamer. >> Those Governments should have pushed for a migration to IPv6 instead >> of looking for small crumbs and acting as a forerunner. > > At some extent, several governments over the years have funded > sectorial-driven deployments :-) > Not enough though. >> Then use the crumbs for NATPT bridging them to the parts of the >> Internet, that don't use v6 yet. > > You mean, the large majority... ;-) > Oh .. it has gotten a lot better in the last years. >> It would also pushed the suppliers in the right direction then. > > I would say that suppliers aren't being pushed enough, even today... ;-( > Agreed. And it's the cheap arse end-user suppliers, that are the worse, because they're still in the way, even with the v6 roll-out has been done and automated .. all the way to the end-customer. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen Airwire Ltd. > > >> Kind regards, >> Martin List-Petersen >> -- >> Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair >> http://www.airwire.ie >> Phone: 091-865 968 >> Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-865 968 - Registered >> in Ireland No. 508961 >> >> -- Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair http://www.airwire.ie Phone: 091-865 968 Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-865 968 - Registered in Ireland No. 508961
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]