This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tom Lehtinen
ripe at tombii.com
Thu Sep 22 23:39:58 CEST 2016
On 22.09.2016 19:22, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > On Thu Sep 22, 2016 at 07:05:26PM +0200, Tom Lehtinen wrote: >> My point actually is, and as it has been >> pointed out by some others, that it does not feel fair that everyone >> pays the same regardless of how much resources they are holding. > > It does not matter that you feel it is not fair as to make it > fair for you makes it unfair for others and that is not fair > Sure, someone will always feel that it's unfair. However, each member has a vote and if the majority decides to vote for a different charging scheme, then that will be what the majority finds fair. Nigel brought up the topic because he obviously has heard that some LIRs are not happy with the current situation and that is why we are discussing the topic. > [snip]
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]