[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model

On 09/22/2016 01:57 PM, Daniel Pearson wrote:
> I'm not saying that a discussion is bad, but I'm simply saying that 
> most of the discussions are being had are not based on fact.
>
> To my knowledge RIPE doesn't have a list of members categorized by 
> assignment size, so this is something that someone would need to parse 
> the RIPE db for, it's all public record so it can be done.

Counting all allocated IPv4 each LIR has, and converting it back to CIDR:

CIDR    Number of LIRs

<= /24       1
<= /23       4
<= /22    6051
<= /21    1582
<= /20    1638
<= /19    1547
<= /18    1040
<= /17     709
<= /16     386
<= /15     293
<= /14     134
<= /13     110
<= /12      80
<= /11      64
<= /10      25
<=  /9      14
<=  /8       6
<=  /7       2

IPv6 only  241


If we were to take ARIN's fees as example where up to and including /20 
is less expensive than RIPE's current fees, 9276 out of the 13686 LIRs 
with IPv4 would pay less.
Not just new ones...

Total income would be similar.


Yours sincerely,

Floris Bos