This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Sat Sep 17 22:29:20 CEST 2016
On 17/09/16 11:23, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote: >> RIPE cannot and will not do this, let me explain why. According to RIPE, >> and most RIR's, their stance is that you do not "own" the IP addresses >> that are given to you, and that they can technically take them back at > > ... and then you have the transfer market, where people got IP addresses > for free some years ago and now they sell them for profit. This the > starting point of all this. Some LIRs do agree and support the "one does > NOT own IPs" stance, other don't or no longer do. Generally those that > need IP space tend to agree, those that have excess not. Of course there > are exceptions.... The strict status is that LIRs have a right to use an internet resource (they do not own it). They can transfer that right to use (but not the resource itself). Just trying to inject a bit of clarity. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]