This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brandon Butterworth
hostmaster at bogons.net
Fri Sep 16 10:00:33 CEST 2016
On Thu Sep 15, 2016 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Nigel Titley wrote: > On 15/09/16 12:41, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > > I'm not sure why RIPE initiated this discussion, it just rakes > > over old arguments that had no route to consensus > > RIPE NCC initiated this discussion as a result of a recent previous > discussion on this list and as a result of a direct request to the > executive board. Are there new options to consider? So far it seems we're just running round the same old circles to satisfy that one person. > I'm afraid this is just an overhead of operating a member focused > organisation. Knowing it's overhead makes it easier to decide spending time on it. brandon
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]