This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brandon Butterworth
hostmaster at bogons.net
Thu Sep 15 14:36:38 CEST 2016
On Thu Sep 15, 2016 at 01:02:39PM +0100, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > out of interest, how would a CS that charges members according to > the amount of resources affect a return of excess reserves, were > that to happen again? Would the amount to be returned have to be > calculated proportionally to the membership fee of the individual > member or would the return be the same for everyone like the last > time I expect they'd try and find a fair or reasonable method > - which amounts to a redistribution from larger to smaller > members? In no way is it ever that. When charges were not flat small ones never paid more than large and large ones have likely been members a long time so large have invested more in RIPE than small. If it's even then it's likely a redistribution from large to small, more so for the scammers joining for free with a legacy /29 they rented for a month brandon
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]