This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
REG ID: pl.skonet
lir at skonet.pl
Wed Sep 14 12:36:58 CEST 2016
W dniu 2016-09-14 o 12:04, Lu Heng pisze: > > If we start asking big one paying 5000 euro a year(in which I don't > think they would care), then unless RIPE tomorrow start spending 100 > million a year, we will have to charge small one with 1000 IP around > 200 Euro or 500 Euro a year...image the situation then. > > We will effectively finish the last /8 in a second. > I completely agree with Lu and I'm opposing to the differentiation of fees depending on the size (based on amount of IPv4 resources only) of the LIR. Best regards -- Tomasz Śląski pl.skonet
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]