This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [#1171078] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arjan van der Oest
Arjan.vanderOest at voiceworks.com
Mon Oct 10 20:32:29 CEST 2016
> On 10 Oct 2016, at 20:28, Ciprian Nica <office at ip-broker.uk> wrote: > > Hi, > > Again I apologize for contacting you (Gert) about a /22 that you have taken from the last /8 more than 2 years ago and which was never announced in the internet (according to ripestat). Probably you didn't need it since you've got on the same LIR a different /22 only 5 days before that one. There are good reasons to obtain PA and not advertise it (yet) in the DFZ. To me, the above seems like finger-pointing... Not the smartest idea, considering the current sentiments towards you. Ymmv, just my 2 cents. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Arjan van der Oest Lead Mobile Engineer Voiceworks BV - Oplagestraat 1 - 1321 NK Almere Mobile : +31 6 8686 0000 Office : +31 36 7606656 GPG key on http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Key fingerprint = C58F 55CA C62A 5A49 15E0 2271 3481 6020 997E EE99
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [#1171078] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]