This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [rrbone Hostmaster] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dominik Bay
hostmaster at rrbone.net
Mon Oct 10 18:02:55 CEST 2016
On 10/10/2016 05:39 PM, John Greenhalgh wrote: >> On Oct 10, 2016, at 18:12, Ciprian Nica <office at ip-broker.uk> wrote: >> I apologize to anyone that was disturbed by my e-mail. I have tried not to send any duplicates and limited as much as possible any discomfort. I'm not doing this on a regular basis and probably you've never got an e-mail from me before. > > I am not sure what the RIPE policies are here and if you have or have not violated them, but I believe your approach is reasonably proportionate, targeted and acceptable, and on my scale of what constitutes spam, I’d say this is pretty far down my list of concerns! I don't consider having various role and person mail addresses in to *and* cc proportionate. It also involves a lot of work to explain new LIRs we assist and our Sponsoring LIR customers what just happened and why they received those E-Mails. -dominik
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]