[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastien Brossier
sebastien at brossier.org
Wed Oct 5 17:58:28 CEST 2016
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 18:02 +0200, Floris Bos wrote: > On 09/27/2016 02:01 PM, Daniel Pearson wrote: > > I don't think anyone disagrees about coming up with a realistic > > pricing discussion. > > Good. > Then the next question would be, what would you consider to be realistic > minimum and maximum fees? 500 EUR minimum and 8000 EUR maximum seems realistic, and would bring the RIPE NCC closer to what the other RIRs are charging. I think that 500 EUR should be an absolute minimum: even after rebate, no one should pay less than that. > Could also have more categories, or have per IP pricing within a > category to smooth things out further. I've done a simulation with a base fee + per IP pricing (no categories): Member fee = min(500.00 + IPv4_count * 0.12, 8000.00) Total IPv4 ALLOCATED PA: 583973120 LIRs: 14027. Total fees: 21237786.40 Data from alloclist.txt, taking only ALLOCATED PA into account. Your category-based proposal also looks fine to me. Regards, Sebastien Brossier
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Spam from Cyprian Nica / IP Broker Limited (Re: Inquiry regarding availability for subnet x.x.x.0 - y.y.y.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]