This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] IETF funding
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marketing KTECHNOLOGY
marketing at ktechnology.it
Sat May 28 12:23:23 CEST 2016
As Peter and Gert wrote: It seems unclear why We (ripe) should support ietf with a one shot payment. Anyway I also would like to understand why IETF (today a big stone) don't ask its members/vendors for support. I could agree to use RIPE founds to support any organization that could not be able to have enough founds for specific reasons, but honestly, even if I know the IETF importance, I don't see any actions it tkake or took to support us (lir and ripe). Use a so big admount of founds seems not clear. My opinion is to refuse the ietf request or to give a scheduled and well documented annual support to be used for specific activity in benefith for both. I appreciate any clarifications Sergio Ioppolo Il 26/Mag/2016 09:24, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:41:36AM +0200, Peter Koch wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > > > > > As requested by Nigel Titley at the NCC Services working group > session, I would like to express my support for the RIPE NCC to participate > in the long-term funding to the IETF. > > > > I think it is easy to agree with the general principle, however I was > not impressed > > by today's presentation because it did not provide relevant information > in addition > > (nor in response) to the discussion at the previous GM. > > What Peter says. > > Supporting the IETF is good, with a yearly contribution to ISOC or IETF > directly. > > Transferring our reserves to their reserves, I fail to see the compelling > reason why this would be in our (RIPE) interest. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the > general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From > here, you can add or remove addresses. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160528/f4d8b3ac/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]